 |
 |
| |
 |
|
|
|
| Enquête d'observation - ProEthique |
 |
| |
 | | Nous avons trouvé une corrélation de 92% entre les résultats des tests Midot et les résultats du détecteur de mensonge. Nous faisons passer les deux outils à tous nos candidats.
|
Y. Rahamim, Directeur des Opérations, Division ATM - Brinks Israel | | | | …en utilisant les résultats associés aux évaluations internes des performances, nous étions capables de mieux focaliser l'attention de nos directeurs. L'usage des outils Midot est facile grâce à son format et à sa facilité d'accès.
|
Humberto Fernandez-Mauro, Directeur Général - Intaco Costa Rica | | | |
| | |  |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
R&D |
 |
|
|
 |
|  Predictive validity of Midot’s test under the academic supervision of Derby University
The question of test validity in predicting good employees for hiring decisions was the basis of this study involving Midot’s integrity test. The main conclusion from the findings of the study is that Midot’s test contributes to the ability to screen-out unreliable job applicants and thereby raise the overall level of occupational integrity in the organization.
to the Articles >> | | | A leading Israeli bank carries out an external study to check the match between the Midot Test and background checks
In December 2006, an external study of Midot’s test was conducted by a large Israeli bank. They found an 85% rate of concurrence between the number of disqualified applicants by the Midot test and those disqualified by the bank's own background investigations, and the same percentage of those recommended based by Midot and those recommended by the investigations.
to the Articles >> | | | Brinks - An independent validity study
An independent study conducted by Brinks (Israel) Ltd found a match of 92% between the findings of Midot and the their polygraph examinations conducted on the same applicants.
to the Articles >> | | | Excuse me, what do you think this test is testing? The face validity of integrity tests
People dealing with assessments often talk about validity. Some (usually assessment professionals) have a full understanding of the term while others find it important to include this term when discussing assessment quality (even if the concept is not fully understood). The following article discusses one type of validity, face validity: what it is, how it is measured, what impact it bears and how it may be enhanced.
to the Articles >> | | | New Study: Intelligent Candidates are Unsuccessful in Deceiving Integrity Tests
A study conducted on 1,026 subjects, who had undergone integrity testing at Midot, shows how intelligent and highly educated subjects are unsuccessful at faking their responses to get higher scores on integrity.
to the Articles >> | | | 17.5% of Job Candidates Try to Conceal or Distort Details of their Resumes
According to data collected by Midot, based on 8,600 checks conducted on candidates for employment. 8% were “inexact” in something related to their level of education, degrees and training courses. 6% submitted letters of recommendation that were valueless or forged. A simple request to submit a certificate of participation in a course often lead to withdrawal of an individual’s candidacy.
to the Articles >> | | | Lies between Genders
Do men receive higher scores than women on integrity and trustworthiness tests, or do women take the lead on such tests? Midot recently examined the results of the integrity tests of thousands of subjects, and discovered a number of interesting findings.
to the Articles >> | | | Identifying Fakers on Integrity Tests
Employment candidates do not necessarily present themselves honestly on selection tests, and the same is true for integrity tests. This article presents several beneficial and recommended methods for identifying individuals distorting the truth, and ways to increase the accuracy of candidates' answers. Specifically, presented below are the results of an experimental study which was conducted to examine the use of indirect measurements (i.e., response time and length of answer) in distinguishing between candidates who distort their answers and those who are honest. The study showed that there are several measurements which can help in making such a distinction.
to the Articles >> | | |
|
|
